Informational Lobbying and Legislative Voting
نویسنده
چکیده
I analyze a model of interest group influence on legislative voting through information transmission. The model shows how interest groups may craft different messages to target different winning coalitions in order to influence the outcome. If access to legislators is costly then interest groups prefer to coordinate with allied legislators by providing them with information that helps them to persuade less sympathetic legislators. The model reconciles informational theories of lobbying with empirical evidence suggesting that interest groups predominantly lobby those who already agree with them. The model also makes new predictions about the welfare effects of interest group influence: from an ex ante perspective, informational lobbying negatively effects the welfare of legislators. The results highlight the need for more theories of persuasion that take collective choice institutions into account. Words in text: 7916 Words in headers: 58 Words outside text (captions, etc.): 774 Number of math inlines: 402 Number of math displayed: 22 Total: 7916+58+774+402+22 = 9172 ∗Assistant Professor of Public Policy, Martin School of Public Policy and Administration, University of Kentucky. Contact: [email protected]. The author would like to thank John Patty, Maggie Penn, William Minozzi, Randy Calvert, Justin Fox, Ian Turner, Michael Nelson, and seminar participants at Université du Québec à Montréal, Yale University, and Washington University in St. Louis.
منابع مشابه
The Influence of Campaign Contributions on Legislative Policy
Although many think campaign donations buy influence from legislators, scholars have difficulty determining whether and how much influence contributions have in the legislative process. Many studies seek to identify the influence of donors on roll call votes. After considerable debate most scholars have concluded that donors have little influence on these votes. What voting studies cannot detec...
متن کاملBusiness as Usual: Interest Group Access and Representation Across Policy-Making Venues
We provide the first comprehensive study of lobbying across venues by studying interest group registrations in both the legislative and administrative branches. We present four major findings based on Federal and state data. First, groups engage in substantial administrative lobbying relative to legislative lobbying. Second, the vast majority of groups lobby the legislature, but a large proport...
متن کاملInformational Lobbying and Agenda Distortion
This paper challenges the prevailing view that strict informational lobbying (in the absence of political contributions and evidence distortion) leads to better policy outcomes. Key to our analysis is the fact that policymakers are constrained on the number of issues they can address, which forces them to prioritize issues. We show how interest groups advocating reform on less-important issues ...
متن کاملThe control complexity of sincere strategy preference based approval voting and of fallback voting, and a study of optimal lobbying and Junta distributions for SAT
While voting systems were originally used in political science, they are now also of central importance in various areas of computer science, such as artificial intelligence (in particular within multiagent systems). Brams and Sanver [BS06] introduced sincere-strategy preference-based approval voting (SP-AV) and fallback voting (FV), two election systems which combine the preference rankings of...
متن کاملVoting Power in Weighted Voting Games: A Lobbying Approach by
We report experiments on the following lobbying game. Two lobbyists have identical budgets and simultaneously distribute them across voters in a legislature. Each voter votes for the lobbyist who pays them most and the lobbyist who receives most votes wins a prize. Taking the share of the budget distributed to a voter as a measure of the voter‟s voting power we investigate how voting power vari...
متن کامل